# Can you copyright a gradient or a colour palette? [Canonical HTML page](https://gradiently.design/guide/can-you-copyright-a-gradient) You found the perfect blend, or someone copied yours. Before you worry, it helps to know what copyright covers, what it leaves free, and what you can protect instead. ## The short version - A simple gradient between a few colours is generally too basic to be protected by copyright, because copyright protects original creative expression, not colours or common techniques. - The US Copyright Office lists mere variations of colouring among the things that cannot be registered. - A colour palette is a list of choices, much like a list of ingredients, and on its own is not usually treated as a copyrighted work. - A finished artwork, illustration or poster that uses a gradient can be protected as a whole, even though its colours stay free for anyone. - Owning a Mark on Gradiently is a record in Gradiently's own registry, not a copyright or a trademark. **Can you copyright a gradient?** In general, no. A blend from one colour to another, or a palette of five hex codes, is treated as too simple to be an original creative work, so copyright does not protect it. What copyright can protect is a finished piece that uses a gradient: an illustration, a poster, a complex artwork with real creative choices in it. These are general principles that hold in most countries, not legal advice; for a real dispute, talk to an intellectual property lawyer where you are. ## What copyright protects, and what it leaves free Copyright protects original expression: the specific way an author arranges words, images or sounds. It does not protect ideas, facts, methods or basic building blocks. Colours are building blocks. So are straight lines, circles and the technique of blending one hue into another. In the US, the Copyright Office's own regulations list **mere variations of coloring** among things that cannot be registered, alongside familiar symbols and simple designs. | Thing | Protected by copyright? | Why | | --- | --- | --- | | A single colour or hex code | No | A basic building block nobody can own through copyright | | A two or three colour gradient | Generally no | Too simple to show original creative expression | | A colour palette | Generally no | A list of choices, like a list of ingredients | | A short CSS gradient snippet | Rarely | Functional and very short, with few ways to write it | | An illustration built from gradients | Usually yes | The composition as a whole carries creative choices | | A photograph of a sunset | Yes | The photo is protected; the colours in it are not | General principles that apply in most countries. Courts judge each case on its own facts. - Violet to pink: free for anyone: `linear-gradient(135deg, #7c3aed 0%, #ec4899 100%)` - Blue to cyan: free for anyone: `linear-gradient(180deg, #0ea5e9 0%, #22d3ee 100%)` - Orange to magenta: free for anyone: `linear-gradient(160deg, #f97316 0%, #db2777 100%)` Simple two colour blends like these appear in thousands of designs. Nobody can claim copyright in them. ## Can you copyright a colour palette? A palette is a selection. Choosing five colours that work together takes taste, but copyright rewards expression, not good choices in themselves. Think of a recipe: the list of ingredients is not protected, while a cookbook's written instructions and photographs are. Your brand palette works the same way. Anyone can pick the same hex codes, and in a crowded category somebody probably already has. That is why [choosing brand colours](https://gradiently.design/guide/how-to-choose-brand-colors) is really about how you combine and apply them. - Soot: #14110f - Walnut: #3d2b1f - Terracotta: #b4542d - Saffron: #e9c46a - Linen: #f4eee4 A considered palette, but still just five choices. Its value comes from how consistently a brand uses it, not from any legal right in the colours. ## When a gradient design can be protected The line moves once a gradient becomes part of a larger, original piece. An abstract poster where shapes, light and colour are arranged with real intent is an artwork, and the artwork as a whole can be protected. A wallpaper painted by an artist, an album cover, a detailed illustration: all likely protected. Copying the whole image, or a recognisable part of it, is a very different act from using the same two colours. ### Usually free to use - The same colours as another brand - The same blend direction and stops - A common technique, such as grain or mesh - A style or mood, such as soft pastels ### Likely to cause trouble - Tracing or copying someone's artwork - Downloading a creator's wallpaper and reselling it - Reproducing a competitor's packaging so buyers are confused - Using a registered trademark colour in the same category > **Copyright is not the only law** Even when copyright does not apply, trademark and passing off laws can stop a competitor copying your overall look in a way that confuses customers. [Colour trademarks](https://gradiently.design/guide/can-you-trademark-a-color) are rare, but they exist. ## How to protect a look you can't copyright If the law gives a simple gradient so little protection, the practical defence is distinctiveness. A look that is specific, consistent and hard to reproduce by accident becomes yours in the minds of customers, which is what really matters day to day. 1. **Go beyond two colours** Build on a ground with a family of related tones and one accent. A two colour blend is everyone's; a five tone recipe with a direction of light is far more specific. 2. **Add a material** Grain, paper, sheen or glass make a surface that is much harder to copy with a colour picker. [Brand texture](https://gradiently.design/guide/brand-texture) covers the options. 3. **Pair it with type** The same heading font and layout habits on every piece turn colours into a signature. 4. **Use it everywhere, for years** Recognition comes from repetition. A look you change every quarter never becomes an asset. 5. **Keep records** Save dated files and published posts. If you ever need to show you used something first, the evidence helps. A ceramics studio post on a layered, grainy gradient with calm type announcing a spring collection A full recipe of ground, colour family, material and type is much harder to imitate than a two colour blend. ## Marks on Gradiently are a platform record Gradiently is built around this gap. A Mark is a complete look: colours, up to three materials, light, grain, motion and a type voice. Each Mark is checked against every other, and anything too close is refused, so no two look alike. When you claim one, your name goes on its public record with a numbered certificate, and only you can export designs with it. Be clear about what that is: a record in Gradiently's registry. **It is not a copyright, not a trademark and not an NFT**, and it has no effect on what people do outside Gradiently. Inside it, the look is yours alone. [Mark codes and certificates](https://gradiently.design/guide/mark-codes-and-certificates) explains how anyone can check who holds one. ## FAQ ### Can you copyright a gradient? Generally no. A simple blend of colours is too basic to count as original creative expression, though a finished artwork that uses a gradient can be protected as a whole. ### Can you copyright a colour palette? Usually not. A palette is a selection of colours, and copyright does not protect colours or simple lists of choices. ### Is it legal to use the same gradient as another brand? Using the same colours is generally allowed. Copying someone's actual artwork, or imitating a competitor's look so customers are confused, can break copyright or trademark law. ### Is CSS gradient code copyrighted? A short gradient snippet is functional and has few ways to be written, so it rarely attracts copyright. Larger, original codebases are a different matter. ### Does owning a Mark on Gradiently give me copyright? No. Owning a Mark is a record in Gradiently's registry that makes you its only owner on the platform. It is not a copyright or a trademark.